FaGal
Nuovo Utente
- Registrato
- 21/7/02
- Messaggi
- 17.980
- Punti reazioni
- 231
Dollar dips, deficits rise, U.S. falls into danger
www.nj.com - February 25, 2005
While President Bush was busy wooing our European "allies," he got whacked by one of our Asian allies.
On Monday, South Korea's central bank let it be known that it will begin stocking its reserve of foreign currencies with fewer dollar assets and more of other currencies, such as the high-flying euro. It's called "diversifying" one's portfolio, a euphemism for saying the good old greenback doesn't look like such a good investment bet these days.
The Koreans are not alone. Russia actually led the way, with its central bank announcing last fall that it would begin purchasing euros as opposed to dollars. Other central banks on the Continent, notably those in Germany and France, have sent similar signals and for the same reason: The spiraling American trade and budget deficits -- and the Bush administration's apparent indifference to both -- have begun to erode confidence in the buck.
It's nothing close to a crisis as yet. A mild turn away from the dollar has been under way for months. Even South Korea's decision was more a psychology than an immediate fiscal blow. But if it continues unchecked, the dollar's slide will have serious consequences for America's role as global economic leader and for the quality of life of ordinary Americans.
This is not rocket science, though some in the economic dodge would make it seem so. It's really a simple story. The government, like you and me, can't keep spending and borrowing in ever- larger amounts without finding its credit tapped out.
The trade deficit with the rest of the world -- the value of what we import compared with what we export -- hit a record-high $617.7 billion last year. And it's still growing. The federal budget deficit is equally bad. The red ink this year is calculated at approximately $420 billion -- and that's not counting $80 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and who knows how much for Bush's prescription drug plan and Social Security privatization scheme.
To finance all this high living, our federal fiduciaries are borrowing roughly $2 billion a day. The world is awash in dollars owed. And unless Washington is running a Ponzi scheme, it's all going to have to be paid back one day.
The impact on the dollar has been dramatic. In the last three years it has lost roughly 15 percent of its value against the currencies of most of our major European trading partners. The decline would be worse but for the action of China and Japan, which are buying up dollar-based securities, like treasury bills, at a frantic pace. (By propping up the dollar, they hope to help their own trade surpluses.)
How do we get out of this fix? Not without pain. Already, the dip in the dollar has helped drive up the price of oil since oil is traded worldwide in dollars. Most foreign central bankers want Bush to raise taxes to help reduce the budget deficit; at the very least they want him to back off making his tax cuts permanent. So far, Bush is resisting; he always gets his back up about tax increases. After all, cutting taxes wins votes.
But that act may wear thin, if not just now then sometime soon. Already, interest rates are beginning to climb. And if the dollar slips much further -- as many economists believe it will -- rates will have to climb even more to attract the foreign investors we've become so dependent upon.
That's the catch-22 aspect of our twin-deficits dilemma: We need an even lower-valued dollar to discourage import buying and make our own exports more affordable, but that produces higher interest rates, which tend to chill economic growth and job creation. A nice mess, huh?
So far, Bush and his supply-side alchemists have turned a blind eye to the problem, perhaps on the theory that they'll be long gone from Washington before the bill comes due. But that's reprehensible, as the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, makes clear.
"Doing nothing is not an option," the institute said in a recent report. "The consequences will be much too costly. As a nation, we are financing today's consumption by mortgaging tomorrow's living standards ... the bill will be a whopper."
In "Debt and the Dollar," institute economist Josh Bivens calculates that U.S. foreign debt exploded from 4 percent of the economy (gross domestic product) in 1992 to 24 percent by the end of 2003. And it's still growing. At its current trajectory, it would total 64 percent of GDP in 10 years, Bivens concludes.
"Although the U.S. economy may not be eating its seed corn," he writes, "it is financing current consumption by selling away today the claim to income generated by tomorrow's harvest. This is not a healthy state of affairs."
Amen to that.
www.nj.com - February 25, 2005
While President Bush was busy wooing our European "allies," he got whacked by one of our Asian allies.
On Monday, South Korea's central bank let it be known that it will begin stocking its reserve of foreign currencies with fewer dollar assets and more of other currencies, such as the high-flying euro. It's called "diversifying" one's portfolio, a euphemism for saying the good old greenback doesn't look like such a good investment bet these days.
The Koreans are not alone. Russia actually led the way, with its central bank announcing last fall that it would begin purchasing euros as opposed to dollars. Other central banks on the Continent, notably those in Germany and France, have sent similar signals and for the same reason: The spiraling American trade and budget deficits -- and the Bush administration's apparent indifference to both -- have begun to erode confidence in the buck.
It's nothing close to a crisis as yet. A mild turn away from the dollar has been under way for months. Even South Korea's decision was more a psychology than an immediate fiscal blow. But if it continues unchecked, the dollar's slide will have serious consequences for America's role as global economic leader and for the quality of life of ordinary Americans.
This is not rocket science, though some in the economic dodge would make it seem so. It's really a simple story. The government, like you and me, can't keep spending and borrowing in ever- larger amounts without finding its credit tapped out.
The trade deficit with the rest of the world -- the value of what we import compared with what we export -- hit a record-high $617.7 billion last year. And it's still growing. The federal budget deficit is equally bad. The red ink this year is calculated at approximately $420 billion -- and that's not counting $80 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and who knows how much for Bush's prescription drug plan and Social Security privatization scheme.
To finance all this high living, our federal fiduciaries are borrowing roughly $2 billion a day. The world is awash in dollars owed. And unless Washington is running a Ponzi scheme, it's all going to have to be paid back one day.
The impact on the dollar has been dramatic. In the last three years it has lost roughly 15 percent of its value against the currencies of most of our major European trading partners. The decline would be worse but for the action of China and Japan, which are buying up dollar-based securities, like treasury bills, at a frantic pace. (By propping up the dollar, they hope to help their own trade surpluses.)
How do we get out of this fix? Not without pain. Already, the dip in the dollar has helped drive up the price of oil since oil is traded worldwide in dollars. Most foreign central bankers want Bush to raise taxes to help reduce the budget deficit; at the very least they want him to back off making his tax cuts permanent. So far, Bush is resisting; he always gets his back up about tax increases. After all, cutting taxes wins votes.
But that act may wear thin, if not just now then sometime soon. Already, interest rates are beginning to climb. And if the dollar slips much further -- as many economists believe it will -- rates will have to climb even more to attract the foreign investors we've become so dependent upon.
That's the catch-22 aspect of our twin-deficits dilemma: We need an even lower-valued dollar to discourage import buying and make our own exports more affordable, but that produces higher interest rates, which tend to chill economic growth and job creation. A nice mess, huh?
So far, Bush and his supply-side alchemists have turned a blind eye to the problem, perhaps on the theory that they'll be long gone from Washington before the bill comes due. But that's reprehensible, as the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, makes clear.
"Doing nothing is not an option," the institute said in a recent report. "The consequences will be much too costly. As a nation, we are financing today's consumption by mortgaging tomorrow's living standards ... the bill will be a whopper."
In "Debt and the Dollar," institute economist Josh Bivens calculates that U.S. foreign debt exploded from 4 percent of the economy (gross domestic product) in 1992 to 24 percent by the end of 2003. And it's still growing. At its current trajectory, it would total 64 percent of GDP in 10 years, Bivens concludes.
"Although the U.S. economy may not be eating its seed corn," he writes, "it is financing current consumption by selling away today the claim to income generated by tomorrow's harvest. This is not a healthy state of affairs."
Amen to that.