ESI (itt educational svc)-31%

skicross

Utente Registrato
Registrato
2/8/03
Messaggi
6.853
Punti reazioni
214
Ciao a tutti!
Oggi bella botta da -30%.
Nessuno conosce il titolo?
A mio avviso puo' ancora perdere parecchio,e a occhio penso che possa arrivare in area 6/5,70 dai valori attuali (9,80 in questo momento).
Come lo vedete?
Mi piacerebbe sapere qualcosa in più' a livello fondamentale dai più' ferrati del forum!
Grazie anticipatamente!;)
SX.
 
Bene bene,
Come avevo detto aveva ancora parecchio spazio in caduta!
Chiusura 7,72 con un bel -46%!
Da domani è da monitorare e grazie 1000 per le analisi!;):D
 
NEW YORK, Aug. 4, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of ITT Educational Services Inc. ("ITT" or the "Company") (NYSE: ESI). Investors are advised to contact Robert S. Willoughby at rswilloughby@pomlaw.com or 888-476-6529, ext. 237.

The investigation concerns whether ITT and certain of its officers and/or directors have violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

On February 26, 2014, a report published in Barron's, a business news publication announced that Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB") filed a lawsuit against ITT regarding its credit practices.



The report states that, "The CFPB's lawsuit alleges that ITT encouraged new students to enroll at ITT by providing them funding for [a] tuition gap with a zero-interest loan called 'Temporary Credit.' This loan typically had to be paid in full at the end of the student's first academic year. But ITT knew from the outset that many students would not be able to repay their Temporary Credit balances or fund their next year's tuition gap."

"The CFPB lawsuit alleges that between July 2011 and December 2011, ITT pushed its students into repaying their Temporary Credit and funding their second-year tuition gaps through high-cost private student loan programs. Students were left in the dark about the fact that taking out these high-cost loans would be required to continue their studies. However, ITT's CEO revealed in investor calls that converting the temporary loans to long-term loans was the company's "plan all along.""

On this news, shares of ITT fell $3.10, or more than 10.19%, on intraday trading to a price of $29.10 on February 27, 2014.

On May 22, 2014, the Company reported preliminary 2014 first quarter results and provided an update on the status of its financial statements in which it announced that the Company is withdrawing its previously-disclosed internal goals for the twelve months ending December 31, 2014, and investors should not rely on those internal goals.

On this news, shares of ITT fell $2.41, or more than 9.34%, on intraday trading to a price of $23.39 on May 22, 2014.

On June 24, 2014, ITT announced in a Securities and Exchange Commission, (SEC) Form 8-K filing, "that the Company should have consolidated the financial results of the PEAKS Trust in the Company's consolidated financial statements beginning on February 28, 2013, the Company's Audit Committee concluded that the Company will need to restate the unaudited financial statements in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each of the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2013, June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2013, and that those previously-issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon. Further, the preliminary financial information included in the Company's press releases issued on January 30, 2014 and May 22, 2014, and provided during the conference calls on those same days, should no longer be relied upon."

On this news, shares of ITT fell $0.60, or more than 3.52%, on intraday trading to a price of $16.44 on June 24, 2014.

On August 4, 2014, a report published by the Wall Street Journal stated that the Company disclosed that its sale leaseback agreement with College Portfolio Buyer, LLC. was terminated today.

On this news, shares of ITT fell $6.59, or more than 46.05%, on intraday trading to a price of $7.72 on August 4, 2014.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, San Diego and Florida, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 70 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See Pomerantz Law.
 
Azzzzzzz se nn ho capito male si beccano una bella class action!!!!!:rolleyes:
Meglio osservare,sti titoli del Nyse possono fare brutti scherzi!:(
 
ITT Educational Services stock finishes down over 46% on Monday.
The drop is caused by an August 1 filing that indicated that a $119M property leaseback deal has been cancelled.
ITT rejected an extension of the due diligence period in order to entertain other potential buyers.
The market treated the news by subtracting $155M off of ITT's valuation, essentially saying that the property it owns is now worth less than zero from $119M on Friday.
On May 21 with ITT Educational Services (NYSE:ESI) stock trading at $25, Nick Mulcahy wrote a bullish article. As the stock closed today at only $7.71 clearly he was quite early on his call. However, his points are still valid, both the negative and positive. Yet the stock is down 70% from when he made the call to buy. Not much has really changed. We have already seen the bearish arguments and know that enrollment is down and we know that the company faces increased regulatory scrutiny. This is why the stock was trading at just over $14 on Friday from Mulcahy's $25 entry in May.

However something happened on Monday that shocked just about everybody. In response to an 8-K filed on Friday, the stock sold off over 46%. In fact it opened up at $13.98, only down a few points seemingly shrugging off the filing but then high volume selloff throughout the day ensued. It was relentless and unlike anything that I've seen in quite some time. And all of this was caused by the cancellation of a seemingly innocuous property leaseback transaction. What happened was that the undisclosed buyer wanted to extend the due diligence period but ITT rejected the request because it did not want to tie up the property for another 45 days. Rejecting the amendment to the due diligence period allows ITT to "enter in to negotiations with other potential buyers."

It is important to remember that this deal involves a sale of property that ITT owns. The value of the deal was projected at about $119M. On the news of the deal being cancelled, ITT's market valuation dropped $155M. So the market is saying that suddenly all of this property that ITT owns is now not only completely worthless, but it has a negative value of over $35M. Clearly this does not make sense and the drop was likely fueled by a series of panic selling and perhaps margin calls in a frightened private education market. This hysteria was accentuated by media like Bloomberg who throughout the day kept hammering away about various regulatory issues that we already knew about but coupled with this catalyst of the leaseback deal being cancelled mass fear ensued.

Despite all of this negativity, a cool headed Bank of America analyst reiterated her neutral rating on the stock and lowered the price target from $19 to $16, which represents over 100% upside from Monday's closing price. Furthermore, the company released a statement in after hours trading that the CEO has resigned and as expected the fear mongering continued on Twitter. Even Herb Greenberg can't resist firing off a few random shots. I'd expect that the company will have a more formal response to this shortly and also that the analysts, who are sitting on a $22 median target, will likely further defend the stock from this absurd and unwarranted drop. There is no telling how the 5 hedge funds that own 50% of ITT's common shares will react. I don't imagine that these funds were scared money selling in to the panic. Certainly a potential positive upside catalyst can come from imminent activism at these depressed levels.

It is important to mention that when the deal was originally announced for the $119M leaseback the stock did not move on this news. The fact that it sold off more than 46% based on a cancellation of this deal indicates to me that it is purely fear based irrational selling. Accordingly, ITT's stock should rebound sharply off of these lows once logic ultimately takes over. After all, this is a company that is expected to make over $60M net profit this year and over $50M next year. A company with 19 properties that it is shopping around that is worth around $119M and cash in hand of at least $170M with only $60M in easily manageable debt. Not to mention that ITT has an additional 11 properties likely worth over $50M as well that can be sold. I can't believe that I was able to buy this company today for only a $180M value. Do not expect this fire sale to last very long.
 
Entrato adesso!;)
7,8!
 
Ultima modifica:
Okkio al nyse a me mi è capitato due a nni fa una cosa molto spiacevole:wall::wall::wall:
 
strong buy

strong buy

US45068B1098
 

Allegati

  • esi 1.PNG
    esi 1.PNG
    36,8 KB · Visite: 90
mmm definire un draw down di -50% previsione azzeccata è un po' azzardato :)

se si vuole rischiare con bidoni in caduta libera o si fa un analisi di bilancio approfondita o si gioca con mordi e fuggi da scalping di qualche ora max giorni. o secondo me si rischia il tracollo
 
mmm definire un draw down di -50% previsione azzeccata è un po' azzardato :)

se si vuole rischiare con bidoni in caduta libera o si fa un analisi di bilancio approfondita o si gioca con mordi e fuggi da scalping di qualche ora max giorni. o secondo me si rischia il tracollo

Le mie sono salite tutte, e non di poco, le tue non mi sembra siano andate avanti. Poi fai pure le analisi di bilancio, se questo ti sembra un metodo migliore. Io giudico i fatti.
 
cioè tu critichi gnappo che fà delle buone analisi dei fond. quando hai segnalato un titolo a 8,73 ed è sceso fino a 3,66 perdendo il 58% ??
per poi upparlo dopo 3 mesi quando risale??
 

Allegati

  • sc.png
    sc.png
    25,9 KB · Visite: 64
cioè tu critichi gnappo che fà delle buone analisi dei fond. quando hai segnalato un titolo a 8,73 ed è sceso fino a 3,66 perdendo il 58% ??
per poi upparlo dopo 3 mesi quando risale??

io l'ho suggerito a 8.74 e il titolo è schizzato a 14.10, pari al 61.21%. Se poi qualcuno è riuscito ad entrare più in basso ha fatto bene a triplicare.
 
Indietro