scie

axelvento

dCellVax
Registrato
21/12/04
Messaggi
16.246
Punti reazioni
419

Allegati

  • scie.png
    scie.png
    18,1 KB · Visite: 146
Authorized Shares 746,915,000
Outstanding Shares 198,039,192
 
entrato 57 tanto arriva a 0,0
 
fuori non mi piace piu
 
penso che possa dare soddisfazioni questo titolo, il prodotto è interessante.

aspetto ad entrare, non vorrei che dopo l'accumulo scenda brevemente per spaventare qualcuno e lì entrerò. Diversamente sono buoni livelli questi.:bye:
 
WavSTAT™ Optical Biopsy System mentioned on Blue Cross/Blue Shield website

Anthem Health Insurance website:
(it's the real deal, check it out)
https://www.anthem.com/health-insurance/home/overview

Now go to their Policy Page:
https://www.anthem.com/medicalpolicies/polici...050516.htm


It's not old. Look at the dates:

Quote:

Current Effective Date: 01/01/2016
Status: Reviewed Last Review Date: 02/05/2015



Specifically names Spectra Science:


Quote:
One device for fiberoptic analysis of colorectal polyps has received FDA pre-market approval (that is, the Optical Biopsy System™, SpectraScience, Minneapolis, MN).


WavSTAT4 works well. It has FDA approval:


Quote:
The FDA approval for this device was based in part on the results of a prospective study of 101 individuals undergoing colonoscopy that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the fiberoptic system compared to physician assessment alone.



Optical Biopsy System™ mentioned several times. Specifically states 'not intended to be used as a stand-alone device' which is great because it makes the WavSTAT4 interchangeable with different technologies; perfect for meeting the needs of different hospitals :


Quote:
The Optical Biopsy System is not intended to be used as a stand-alone device or as a diagnostic test to be done instead of colonoscopy. The Optical Biopsy System is designed to be used as an additional tool during colonoscopy to assist the physician in determining whether certain colon polyps are potentially cancerous and should be removed.


It doesn't get any clearer than this. The WavSTAT4 works. It has FDA approval. It's been studied over and over and over. It works so well, it's showing up on Blue Cross / Blue Shield provider's websites

Courtesy of my hookup at the other board




.002:D:D:D
 
che bello otc casino$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 

Allegati

  • scie.png
    scie.png
    17,9 KB · Visite: 44
1000%
al mese
possiamo mettere la firma
 
100 MILLION $ IP INVESTMENT : Spectra Science may be worth more than you think..

Courtesy of Purlistas post :

All my opinion..(as usual)

Has everyone researched the history of spectrascience?

I wont go into it too deep because its all free information, quickly found online, but one very important part of SCIEs history is from 2007 when SCIE acquired all of the shares of Luma Imaging Corporation. Sure, the majority of us know of, or at least heard of Luma, but do you know what it was SCIE actually acquired?

Back in 2007, SCIE acquired all inventory and intellectual property of Luma. Why does this matter today? I mean, its been 9 years.. isn't this 'old' news. It is old in the sense that it happened a while back, but what many investors may not know is that SCIE purchased Luma's assets for $5 million in restricted common stock.

And why does this matter? Because, although SCIE purchased the assets of LUMA for $5 million dollars, prior to the acquisition, LUMA invested almost $100 MILLION dollars in creating their technology. Which means, Spectrascience's business valuation may include LUMA's tech worth almost $100 million dollars.

Why does this matter? Because looking at SCIE from an asset based valuation, you probably would have to consider the cost it originally required to create LUMA's technology. In other words, if you (the reader) were to set out with a goal of recreating a cloned company called 'Spectrascience2', you would need to figure out SCIE's net asset value (total assets minus total liabilities). In other words, how much would it cost you to recreate your own Spectrascience. But in doing so, you would need to take into consideration the $100 million dollars spent to create LUMA 's technology.

We could try to put a valuation on SCIE through a market approach, but we'd have to find similar companies with similar technology. And although SCIE has many competitors, SCIE holds the patents to the WavSTAT4 tech.

So to sum up, a little known fact is that the technology behind Spectrascience was not created in a garage, made with spare parts and costing around $75. LUMA invested almost $100 MILLION dollars and now, Spectrascience holds it all; and acquired it for around 5% of the actual cost. When the time comes, and when sales begin, I believe this will play a key role in deciding the true business valuation of Spectrascience.

Note
You may be wondering how SCIE obtained $100 million dollars worth of tech for only $5 million. This is where your DD would come in to play. SCIE got LUMA's tech so inexpensively because one of LUMAs major corporate investors exited the venture funding business, making the cost decrease immensely.

This post from the other board n different author, would of said this at first, but that head line ROCKS just like this article does!!!!


As Real as its gets ...Find us a penny stock as Good as this !!!
 
Indietro