Per cortesia rimaniamo seri, si entra in cravatta

eddai pompatela a 15 dollari che esco e li mando affanq...
 
sembrerebbe che Axia abbia dato giudizio buy su Cell
 
guarda che se parte mica fa solo +9



lassalo perdere a quello...ancora mi ricordo che sul titolo Apcvz quando quotava 0.04 diceva che da li a pochi giorni andava a 0...bene dopo un paio di settimane quotava 0.14 con un rialzo a TRE cifre...e ho detto tutto :D


comunque pure io ho messo un cippetto su marina ;)
 

Allegati

  • iran-missile-balistique-shahab3-1-2.jpg
    iran-missile-balistique-shahab3-1-2.jpg
    27,3 KB · Visite: 322
lassalo perdere a quello...ancora mi ricordo che sul titolo Apcvz quando quotava 0.04 diceva che da li a pochi giorni andava a 0...bene dopo un paio di settimane quotava 0.14 con un rialzo a TRE cifre...e ho detto tutto :D


comunque pure io ho messo un cippetto su marina ;)

Non fare il furbetto del quartiere........Parla di quanto ci stai perdendo:cool::D
 
lassalo perdere a quello...ancora mi ricordo che sul titolo Apcvz quando quotava 0.04 diceva che da li a pochi giorni andava a 0...bene dopo un paio di settimane quotava 0.14 con un rialzo a TRE cifre...e ho detto tutto :D


comunque pure io ho messo un cippetto su marina ;)

tutti in Opaxio te li devi spendere i soldi :D
 
Io stacco...buon proseguimento a tutti.:bye:
 
occhioooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
Cell Therapeutics-FDA set early June pixantrone meeting
Puget Sound Business Journal
Date: Friday, May 20, 2011, 9:52am PDT
Related: Health Care
Enlarge Image

Officials with Cell Therapeutics Inc. said they’ll meet with representatives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Oncology Products early next month to discuss resubmitting the company’s pixantrone cancer drug application.

Officials with Cell Therapeutics Inc. said they’ll meet with representatives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Oncology Products early next month to discuss resubmitting the company’s pixantrone cancer drug application.
Earlier this month, the FDA’s Office of New Drugs “denied the dispute appeal request to conclude that the efficacy of pixantrone has been demonstrated,” but Cell Therapeutics added the “accelerated approval of pixantrone NDA 022481 may not necessarily be out of reach based on a single controlled clinical trial, provided two key matters can be satisfactorily resolved. ... If these two key matters are addressed satisfactorily, then PIX301 could be deemed successful,” officials said in a statement.
Cell Therapeutics said it will submit a review of a research panel and additional information to the FDA.
Earlier this week, in an effort to get its stock price above the NASDAQ stock exchange’s $1-per-share minimum, Cell Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CTICD) enacted a reverse six-for-one stock split. Its shares now trade above $1 for the first time in 14 months.


Read more: Cell Therapeutics-FDA set early June pixantrone meeting | Puget Sound Business Journal
 
FDA Sets Meeting Date in Early June to Discuss Re-submission of Pixantrone NDA for Accelerated Approval
0
0

0


SEATTLE, May 20, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Cell Therapeutics, Inc. ("CTI") (NASDAQ: CTICD and MTA: CTIC) announced today that it will meet with the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration's (the "FDA") Office of Oncology Drug Products in early June to discuss the re-submission of CTI's New Drug Application ("NDA") for pixantrone for accelerated approval to treat patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ("NHL"). This meeting follows CTI's receipt of the FDA's Office of New Drugs' (the "OND") response to CTI's appeal as announced on May 3, 2011, which allows CTI the opportunity to resubmit the NDA to the FDA with additional information for consideration of accelerated approval of the NDA based on the PIX 301 trial. In the FDA's response to CTI's appeal, the FDA requested that CTI submit two items—an additional review of radiographs by an independent panel and additional information regarding circumstances of stopping the clinical trial prior to achieving the planned accrual to assure reviewers that efficacy assessments were not involved in the decision to stop accrual early.
 
Indietro