Portafoglio Black Dog..la storia continua

ciao a tutti, faccio qui una domanda sul titolo glaxo "hedgiato"
che vedo presente nel ptf del 3d con il codice gs7

vi siete accorti che al cambio quota molto più alto del
prezzo di Londra?

in questo momento quota £14,85 a Londra e €16,69 sullo xetra, cambio 0,9031
:no: va bene per niente, così cambia anche il rendimento :rolleyes:

ne sapete qualcosa? :)

molto strano in effetti, se vuoi aggiungere al personale monitor c'è anche in $ US37733W1053
 
Stavo valutando un ingresso sul titolo Banca Farmafactoring.
L 'azienda opera nell 'ambito del recupero crediti vantati in ambito sanitario nei confronti delle pubbliche amministrazioni.. e non soltanto in Italia.
Anche la politica dei dividendi dovrebbere essere intetessante.
Che ne pensate.. ?
 
dove sono gli aristocrats:
5 Tips to Avoid Dividend Cuts - Dividend Growth Investor

a.jpg
 
è proprio vero che chi non muore si rivede:
Miners Are Flush With Cash Again - WSJ

Fueled by a sharp rise in commodities prices, companies like BHP Billiton Ltd , Glencore GLNCY and Rio Tinto PLC are flush with cash again, boosting dividends, cutting debt and shelling out cash for expansion projects. Just a couple of years ago, they were scrambling to survive in the midst of a historic downturn. The world’s biggest mining company, BHP, reported Tuesday a net profit of $5.9 billion for the 12 months ended June 30. That is a sharp turnaround from the previous year’s loss of $6.4 billion, when the company took big charges from U.S. oil-and-gas business and a fatal 2015 dam failure at an iron-ore operation in Brazil. BHP boosted its annual dividend by 177% and said its net debt had fallen 38% from the previous year to $16.3 billion. BHP’s report caps a strong string of financial results for mining giants such as Rio Tinto, Anglo American NGLOY 0.36% PLC and Glencore. An important sign of these companies’ renewed health is their falling debt load. As of June, BHP, Rio Tinto, Anglo and Glencore collectively held net debt of about $44 billion, down about 50% from the end of 2014, according to a review of their earnings reports. It’s a dramatic shift from two years ago, when the mining industry was reeling. Slowing Chinese growth had sent commodity prices sharply lower. Miners loaded up with debt and cut dividends as their share prices sank. But a surprise rally in the past year in major commodities such as copper, iron ore and coal has been a windfall, bringing in much needed cash, breathing new life into the beleaguered industry and sparking a rally in mining stocks. The S&P 500 Metals & Mining index has doubled since bottoming in January 2016. The question for investors is whether miners will continue to pay down debt—and boost dividends—or, lured by rising commodity prices, return to the big-spending ways that got them into trouble two years ago. Paul Gait, a Bernstein mining-industry analyst, said the rally has returned companies to the financial position they held before the commodity-price bust but not further. That suggests the companies remain shellshocked after the share-price collapse two years ago and are unlikely to launch aggressive spending plans any time soon. “I don’t think management wants to live through the volatility that we saw in the last few years and the near-death experience many of these companies saw,” Mr. Gait said. That is likely bullish for commodity prices in the long run, he said, since it means few new large-scale mines are likely to get started in the coming years, limiting the supply of materials like copper even as demand rises. To be sure, other miners aren’t standing still. Rio Tinto is plowing billions into a giant Mongolian copper mine and is moving ahead on a big bauxite and iron-ore project in Australia. BHP last week said it would spend $2.5 billion to extend the life of a copper mine in Chile. Indeed, copper and a byproduct of copper mining, cobalt, have become darlings of the industry as miners position themselves for what many describe as the next wave of development in China and other industrializing countries. Such countries are likely to scale back demand for bulk commodities such as iron ore and coal, used in steel making, and shift to copper, used in electric grids and consumer products such as washing machines and cars. Cobalt is a key ingredient in lithium-ion batteries that power mobile phones and electric vehicles. “We should see strength in demand for those commodities as economies grow toward the later cycle,” Glencore Chief Executive Ivan Glasenberg said on a recent conference call. The trend away from developing so-called greenfield mines marks a reverse from the so-called commodity supercycle, when surging prices fueled by seemingly bottomless demand in China encouraged miners’ managements to splurge on new projects—and the debt that funded them. BHP in 2011, which posted a record $24 billion in net profit, had plans to invest $20 billion in major projects and exploration over the following year, and more than $80 billion by 2015. Rio planned to invest $14 billion in new projects in 2012. Hunter Hillcoat, a mining analyst at Investec Securities, says there is one exception to miners’ more-cautious stance: Glencore. The Swiss mining giant has been more focused on deal-making than its competitors, inking a $1.1 billion deal in July for a stake in Australian coal assets and mulling a bid for $11 billion grain trader Bunge Ltd.
While Glencore has restored its dividend, returning $1 billion to shareholders in 2017, it didn’t announce an increase in the payout in its latest earnings report this month as did BHP and Rio. Anglo American surprised investors by reinstating the dividend after having suspended it in 2015. That’s fine with David Herro, fund manager for Harris Associates LP, which controls about 5% of Glencore’s stock valued about $3 billion, according to FactSet. A year ago, Mr. Herro wanted Mr. Glasenberg to hold his fire on the deal-making front and focus on restoring the company’s balance sheet after its faced down a share-price collapse in 2015. That’s changed. “They are very astute deal makers,” Mr. Herro said.
 
maledetto clooney:
Vodka Is Big Liquor’s Weak Spot - WSJ

But for their problems selling vodka to Americans, the world’s biggest liquor companies would look in better shape. In full-year results reported Thursday, Paris-based liquor group Pernod Ricard said U.S. sales of its Absolut vodka brand fell 2% over the year through June in a “worsening” market. The top U.S. vodka brand, Smirnoff, is also in decline, according to its London-listed distiller Diageo . One issue is consumer demand for the drink. Having binged on vodka in the 2000s, Americans increasingly favor aged, brown liquor. Last year the U.S. consumed 3.6% more whisky (and whiskey), 7.4% more tequila and 9.9% more brandy, but only 2.2% more vodka, according to data provider IWSR.
Another headache for Diageo and Pernod is competition. Two homegrown upstarts have taken the market by storm: Tito’s , a craft-marketed brand from Austin, Texas, and New Amsterdam, made by Californian winery E & J Gallo.
The U.S. vodka problem has held back otherwise solid growth for the world’s top two liquor groups. The burden is slightly greater for Pernod as Absolut is its single most important brand. The company’s organic sales growth overall clocked in at 3.6% for the year through June, compared with 4.3% for Diageo. A wider worry is that other drinks brands, in other countries, could go the way of U.S. vodka and be overtaken by cleverly marketed new rivals. Some liquors, notably scotch and cognac, are subject to geographic restrictions and aging processes that shut out would-be upstarts, while others, such as gin, can be made at home. When new brands do go viral, big groups can sometimes buy them, but this is very expensive: In June Diageo announced the acquisition of George Clooney’s four-year-old tequila brand Casamigos for up to $1 billion, or almost $500 for every bottle sold. Could Tito’s be next?

a1.jpg
 
Chiedo a voi esperti in materia...
io ho una manciata di azioni Prospect Capital, ed ho il regime amministrato con Fineco dove fanno tutto loro, perchè i dividendi mi sono arrivati tassati solo del 26%? non avrei dovuto pagare la doppia tassazione usa?
grazie
 
Chiedo a voi esperti in materia...
io ho una manciata di azioni Prospect Capital, ed ho il regime amministrato con Fineco dove fanno tutto loro, perchè i dividendi mi sono arrivati tassati solo del 26%? non avrei dovuto pagare la doppia tassazione usa?
grazie

Di solito la tassa usa viene detrtta prima che il dividendo viene accreditato su fineco
 
Di solito la tassa usa viene detrtta prima che il dividendo viene accreditato su fineco

Io mi ritrovo questi:

in entrata: Dividendo estero - Div.su PROSPECT CAPTL (che è lordo)
in uscita: ritenuta dividendo estero Div.su PROSPECT CAPTL (che è il 26% di quello accreditato)

boh
 
Io mi ritrovo questi:

in entrata: Dividendo estero - Div.su PROSPECT CAPTL (che è lordo)
in uscita: ritenuta dividendo estero Div.su PROSPECT CAPTL (che è il 26% di quello accreditato)

boh

come ti ha detto felix, il netto frontiera non lo vedi neppure. prova a fare il conto dividendo pagato dal titolo per numero di azioni e dovresti vedere che quanto arrivato su fineco è già netto della ritenuta straniera
 
sempre su:
Big Food Faces Pressure From Retailers Demanding Discounts - WSJ

America’s packaged-food companies are coming under pressure from retailers who are pushing big brands to lower their prices. On Thursday, Campbell Soup Co.said its sales would suffer this winter because it failed to reach an agreement with a major retailer over promotional pricing and shelf space for its canned soup, its most important product. The unsuccessful negotiations were with Wal-Mart Stores Inc., according to people familiar with the situation. Wal-Mart comprises about 20% of Campbell’s annual sales. Grocery giants, including Wal-Mart and Target Corp. , as well as smaller chains such as Sprouts Farmers Market Inc. are vying to find ways to attract shoppers amid intensifying competition. Amazon.com Inc.’s deeper push into the grocery business with its acquisition of Whole Foods Market Inc. is the latest entrant into an already crowded sector.
Packaged-food companies have been struggling with declining sales for years as shoppers move away from older brands and toward food options perceived as fresher and healthier. Now retailers are adding to the packaged-food companies’ woes. “The retailer landscape is changing dramatically,” Campbell Chief Executive Denise Morrison told analysts on Thursday as the company reported its 11th straight quarter of falling sales. Campbell said negotiations for promotions with retailers involve decisions on pricing, product assortment and other factors, but the company declined to provide details of its recent issue. Campbell’s shares fell nearly 7% on Thursday, the biggest loser in the S&P 500 index.
Wal-Mart is pushing hard to lower prices to compete. Executives at the world’s largest retailer by revenue have told suppliers that its prices should be 15% lower than competitors’ 80% of the time. At the same time, Wal-Mart is spending billions to drop prices strategically on certain products, eating into its own margins to lower prices, sometimes without telling brands in advance, according to managers at large consumer-goods companies that sell through Wal-Mart. When one retailer drops prices, that can challenge brands because other retailers will ask suppliers to match. Kroger Co. , the largest traditional grocer in the U.S., is scheduled to report earnings next week, likely providing additional insight into the tug of war between retailers and brands. Disagreements over the terms of in-store promotions are common but become heightened when retailers are feeling squeezed, and they can be particularly tough in a struggling category like canned soup, said Mathis Martines, vice president of brand and strategy for the Concentric consultancy. “You are seeing the degradation of some of these larger, mature brands,” he said. Hain Celestial Group Inc.’s chief executive, Irwin Simon, said Tuesday that retailers of all kinds are asking for reduced prices. His company, which sells BluePrint refrigerated juice and Terra vegetable chips, reported better-than-expected sales, but he said: “Everyone wants to sell more; everyone wants to cut prices.”
Warren Buffett, an investor and board member of Campbell’s rival Kraft Heinz Co., said Wednesday that the struggle between brands and retailers has been going for decades, but as grocers such as Wal-Mart, Costco Wholesale Corp. and Amazon get stronger, brands have less power to negotiate. “Right now, the retailers, they’re doing better in this round of the fight,” he said in an interview with CNBC.
General Mills Inc., Kellogg Co. and Kraft Heinz say that about one-fifth of their annual sales come from Wal-Mart, giving the retail giant leverage over the biggest food makers in the country. General Mills, which could benefit from Campbell’s loss with its rival Progresso soup brand, declined to comment, as did Kraft Heinz Co. Kellogg didn’t immediately comment. Amazon, which completed its acquisition of Whole Foods on Monday, immediately lowered prices on items such as baby kale and bananas in stores and made more items available online. European discount chains such as Aldi and Lidl are becoming more popular in the U.S., cutting into mainstream grocery sales, by offering lower prices. Campbell’s Ms. Morrison said the industry will remain “hypercompetitive” for the foreseeable future, affected by alternatives to grocery stores such as online shopping with Amazon.com Inc.’s acquisition of Whole Foods and meal-kit services such as Blue Apron Holdings Inc. Campbell is trying to diversify, buying brands such as Pacific Foods organic soup and Bolthouse Farms refrigerated juice. But mainstays such as Pepperidge Farm Goldfish crackers, V8 juice and SpaghettiOs still make up about 85% of Campbell’s $1.67 billion in quarterly sales. Campbell’s sales slid 1.4% in the quarter ended July 30, and its adjusted earnings per share were 52 cents, below analysts’ expectations. The company cut costs in the quarter, with adjusted marketing and promotional expenses down 12%. At J.M. Smucker Co. , which sells Jif peanut butter and Folgers coffee among other brands, price is a key factor for retailers now, Chief Mark Smucker said last week following its earnings. “They are competing, they’re trying to find points of difference. Obviously, price to them is one of those.” Sprouts, a natural-food chain that rivals Whole Foods, said it was forced into cutting prices and offering more promotional deals in the recent quarter because of competition. “It’s heavy ad and in-store promotions,” said Brad Lukow, chief financial officer at Sprouts, during earnings in August. Smart & Final Stores , Inc., a California warehouse-format grocer, said it has increased its mailed fliers on markdowns of key items, given the competition. Discounts and promotions like buy-one-get-one-free deals are crucial for sales growth, particularly in categories that aren’t expanding, such as cereal and frozen meals. About 40% of cereal boxes and 33% of frozen meals are sold on a promotion, according to Nielsen. Bob Goldin, a partner at food industry consultancy Pentallect Inc., said the heavy promotional environment is “an intractable problem” in retail. “Constant discounting depresses everyone’s margins; it also trains consumers only to shop on deal,” he said. Campbell, and other brands, can push back, but retailers have the upper hand because they control the shelf space, Mr. Goldin said.

a.jpg
 
ciao Nemo ....ti risulta che rdsb abbia abbassato il dividendo?
Royal Dutch Shell plc Second Quarter 2017 EURO and GBP Equivalent Dividend Payments
PR Newswire
Sep. 4, 2017, 12:39 PM

THE HAGUE, The Netherlands, September 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

The Board of Royal Dutch Shell plc ("RDS") (NYSE: RDS.A) (NYSE: RDS.B) today announced the pounds sterling and euro equivalent dividend payments in respect of the second quarter 2017 interim dividend, which was announced on July 27, 2017 at US$0.47 per A ordinary share ("A Share") and B ordinary share ("B Share").

Dividends on A Shares will be paid, by default, in euro at the rate of €0.3949 per A Share. Holders of A Shares who have validly submitted pounds sterling currency elections by August 25, 2017 will be entitled to a dividend of 36.28p per A Share.

Dividends on B Shares will be paid, by default, in pounds sterling at the rate of 36.28p per B Share. Holders of B Shares who have validly submitted euro currency elections by August 25, 2017 will be entitled to a dividend of €0.3949 per B Share.

This dividend will be payable on September 18, 2017 to those members whose names were on the Register of Members on August 11, 2017.
Sbaglio o era più alto?
 
ciao Nemo ....ti risulta che rdsb abbia abbassato il dividendo?
Royal Dutch Shell plc Second Quarter 2017 EURO and GBP Equivalent Dividend Payments
PR Newswire
Sep. 4, 2017, 12:39 PM

THE HAGUE, The Netherlands, September 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

The Board of Royal Dutch Shell plc ("RDS") (NYSE: RDS.A) (NYSE: RDS.B) today announced the pounds sterling and euro equivalent dividend payments in respect of the second quarter 2017 interim dividend, which was announced on July 27, 2017 at US$0.47 per A ordinary share ("A Share") and B ordinary share ("B Share").

Dividends on A Shares will be paid, by default, in euro at the rate of €0.3949 per A Share. Holders of A Shares who have validly submitted pounds sterling currency elections by August 25, 2017 will be entitled to a dividend of 36.28p per A Share.

Dividends on B Shares will be paid, by default, in pounds sterling at the rate of 36.28p per B Share. Holders of B Shares who have validly submitted euro currency elections by August 25, 2017 will be entitled to a dividend of €0.3949 per B Share.

This dividend will be payable on September 18, 2017 to those members whose names were on the Register of Members on August 11, 2017.
Sbaglio o era più alto?

Probabilmente è peggiorato il cambio con la sterlina.
Non ha abbassato il dividendo sicuramente.
 
Indietro